Category: Office of Investigations & Questionable Affairs

Official investigative reports by Thaddeus Grimledger, examining suspicious incidents, questionable decisions, and alleged wrongdoing throughout the adventuring world.

  • The Tel Ekir Incident: An Alleged Assassination

    The Tel Ekir Incident: An Alleged Assassination

    An Official Investigation into Attempted Murder, Reckless Goblin Endangerment, and One Suspiciously Convenient Fall

    Case Number: TE-047
    Investigating Officer: Thaddeus Grimledger
    Location: Tel Ekir
    Complainant: Nynkies Nimblefingers
    Accused: Unidentified Monk
    Witness: Shamboogie Spiritshuffler
    Case Status: Investigation Pending


    THE TEL EKIR INCIDENT

    An Official Investigation into Alleged Attempted Murder, Reckless Goblin Endangerment, and One Suspiciously Convenient Fall

    Filed by Chief Investigator Thaddeus Grimledger
    Office of Investigations & Questionable Affairs
    The Wayfarer’s Gazette

    Case Number: TE-047
    Location: Tel Ekir, Goblin Encampment
    Complainant: Nynkies Nimblefingers
    Primary Suspect: Unidentified Monk
    Witness: Shamboogie Spiritshuffler
    Case Status: Open, Pending Further Testimony


    THE INCIDENT

    In my years of investigating suspicious deaths, unexplained disappearances, and adventurers who insist they were merely borrowing things, I have encountered no shortage of questionable explanations.

    This particular case, however, involves an entire encampment of angry goblins, a monk with a remarkable inability to remain upright, and a Goblin Rogue who insists someone tried to murder him.

    The incident occurred during what witnesses described as a routine expedition into Tel Ekir.

    The stated purpose of this expedition was to repair relations with the Ashira, whose opinion of the party had recently suffered a rather dramatic decline. The trouble began with a Deep Elf associate who, through no particular wrongdoing beyond the unfortunate circumstances of his birth, was considered Kill on Sight by the citizens of Night Harbor. In an effort to improve his standing with the city, the party embarked upon a systematic slaughter of the Ashira, apparently operating under the belief that murdering one faction was an acceptable means of making friends with another.

    While this strategy proved useful in improving relations with Night Harbor, it had the entirely predictable consequence of making the Ashira considerably less fond of the party. Thus, the adventurers found themselves in Tel Ekir, slaughtering goblins in an effort to regain the goodwill of the very people they had recently been slaughtering.

    I have reviewed the circumstances surrounding this peculiar approach to diplomacy and can only conclude that adventurers possess a remarkable talent for creating problems that require additional killing to resolve. At this rate, I expect the party will eventually run out of enemies and be forced to start murdering one another for diplomatic purposes.

    At the time of the incident, Nynkies Nimblefingers and Shamboogie Spiritshuffler had joined a temporary group of adventurers, including a monk whose identity is being withheld pending formal charges, or until someone remembers his name.

    THE ALLEGED ATTACK

    Witnesses agree that the monk departed the camp to engage nearby goblins.

    What happened next remains a matter of considerable dispute.

    The monk reportedly attracted the attention of an entire goblin encampment before retreating toward the party’s position at a speed witnesses described as “concerning.”

    Upon reaching the camp, the monk abruptly collapsed to the ground.

    The monk maintains that he slipped.

    Nimblefingers maintains that the monk deliberately employed his Feign Death ability, knowing full well that the pursuing goblins would redirect their aggression toward the unsuspecting party.

    Unfortunately, the monk’s chosen resting place was close enough to the camp that the goblins immediately noticed the remaining adventurers.

    The resulting engagement was described by witnesses as chaotic, violent, and entirely inconsistent with the group’s original plans for the evening.

    Through rapid spellcasting, timely backstabbing, and what Shamboogie described as “a degree of divine intervention I would prefer not to test again,” the party narrowly avoided complete annihilation.

    No fatalities were reported.

    Several undergarments are believed to have been rendered unsuitable for further use.

    I have requested that these garments not be submitted as evidence.

    WITNESS STATEMENT: NYNKIES NIMBLEFINGERS

    When interviewed, Nimblefingers was adamant that the incident constituted a deliberate attempt on his life.

    “Attempted murder! That’s what it was! He brought an entire goblin army straight to us, threw himself on the ground, and left us to die!”

    When asked whether the monk might simply have misjudged the distance between himself and the camp, Nimblefingers became visibly agitated.

    “Misjudged? MISJUDGED? I’ve seen drunken ogres demonstrate better spatial awareness! That monk knew exactly what he was doing!”

    Nimblefingers further suggested that the monk may have been acting on behalf of unnamed enemies.

    When asked to identify these enemies, he produced a list containing forty-seven names, three organizations, and someone identified only as “that miserable little rat from the tavern.”

    I have not yet determined whether this list represents credible suspects or merely individuals to whom Nimblefingers owes money.

    Of additional concern is the complainant’s position as Editor-in-Chief of the very newspaper publishing this investigation.

    When questioned about this potential conflict of interest, Nimblefingers informed me that the Gazette maintains the highest standards of journalistic integrity.

    He then suggested I reconsider the wording of my findings.

    I declined.

    STATEMENT OF THE ACCUSED MONK

    The monk has categorically denied all allegations.

    “I was returning to camp when I lost my footing. It was an accident. I slipped, fell, and nearly landed in the fire.”

    When questioned about the remarkable coincidence of his fall occurring immediately after attracting an entire goblin encampment, the monk reiterated that the terrain was uneven.

    When asked why his fall so closely resembled the disciplined martial technique commonly known as Feign Death, the monk replied:

    “I am a highly trained martial artist. Even my accidents are graceful.”

    I have investigated many unusual defenses over the years. This is the first time a suspect has attempted to use professional competence as an explanation for spectacular incompetence.

    The monk further maintains that any subsequent goblin aggression was an unfortunate and entirely unforeseen consequence of his fall.

    His explanation has been entered into the official record under the heading Possible, But Deeply Irritating.

    EXPERT TESTIMONY: SHAMBOOGIE SPIRITSHUFFLER

    Shamboogie Spiritshuffler, the party’s shaman, provided what I initially hoped would be a more objective account.

    “The monk arrived with a considerable number of goblins following him. He then became horizontal. The goblins, finding him suddenly uninteresting, turned their attention toward us.”

    When asked whether he believed the incident was intentional, Spiritshuffler paused before answering.

    “I have lived long enough to know that foolishness and malice often produce remarkably similar results.”

    I requested clarification.

    He declined, explaining that he was still recovering the spiritual energy expended keeping everyone alive.

    He did, however, confirm that the party’s survival depended upon immediate defensive action and an extraordinary amount of healing.

    I found his testimony credible, although unnecessarily philosophical.

    I have encountered this problem with shamans before.

    INVESTIGATOR’S FINDINGS

    After reviewing the available testimony, I have established the following facts:

    1. The monk attracted substantially more goblins than the party had intended to engage.
    2. The monk returned directly toward the occupied camp.
    3. The monk became prone under circumstances that remain disputed.
    4. The pursuing goblins redirected their attention toward the remaining party members.
    5. The party survived only through rapid defensive action.
    6. Nimblefingers has repeatedly demanded that the monk be arrested, prosecuted, and preferably made to pay for his emotional distress.

    The investigation has also uncovered several troubling inconsistencies.

    The monk insists that he slipped near the campfire, yet no witness recalls seeing him attempt to regain his balance.

    Nimblefingers insists that he was the intended target, despite the goblins displaying equal enthusiasm for murdering everyone present.

    Spiritshuffler insists that the matter is best left to the judgment of higher powers, although I suspect this position is motivated primarily by his desire never to group with the monk again.

    Of particular interest is the monk’s assertion that his fall was accidental.

    I have personally examined the available testimony regarding the terrain. While uneven ground may indeed present a hazard, I find it difficult to accept that a trained martial artist could successfully evade an entire goblin encampment only to be defeated by the earth beneath his own feet.

    Nevertheless, suspicion is not proof.

    A distinction I have repeatedly attempted to explain to Nimblefingers.

    He has repeatedly attempted to explain that I am wrong.

    OFFICIAL DETERMINATION

    At present, I find insufficient evidence to establish that the monk deliberately attempted to assassinate Nynkies Nimblefingers.

    However, the evidence strongly supports a finding of Reckless Endangerment Through Excessive Goblin Transportation.

    Additional consideration is being given to charges of Negligent Feigning, Improper Campfire Approach, and Disturbing the Peace of a Perfectly Respectable Adventuring Party.

    The monk has been advised to exercise greater caution when navigating uneven terrain.

    Nimblefingers has been advised that surviving an incident does not automatically prove that it was an assassination attempt.

    He has rejected this advice.

    The investigation remains open.

    INVESTIGATOR’S FINAL NOTE

    In my years investigating suspicious deaths, unexplained disappearances, and adventurers who insist they were merely borrowing things, I have learned one important lesson.

    When a monk arrives pursued by an entire encampment of angry goblins and immediately falls over, there are only two reasonable explanations.

    Either he is the most unfortunate martial artist in Tel Ekir, or he is a criminal mastermind.

    Regrettably, the evidence suggests he may be both.

    The facts have been recorded. The excuses have been noted. The truth, regrettably, remains under investigation.

    Filed and submitted,
    Thaddeus Grimledger
    Chief Investigator
    Office of Investigations & Questionable Affairs
    The Wayfarer’s Gazette

    Case TE-047: Pending Further Developments

  • The Fallen Pass Incident: Everyone Escaped Except the Tank

    The Fallen Pass Incident: Everyone Escaped Except the Tank

    THE FALLEN PASS INCIDENT (Dainger)

    Everyone Escaped Except the Tank

    An Official Investigation into Selective Evacuation, Magical Negligence, and the Suspicious Survival of One Horse

    Filed by Chief Investigator Thaddeus Grimledger
    Office of Investigations & Questionable Affairs
    The Wayfarer’s Gazette

    Case Number: FP-048
    Location: Fallen Pass
    Complainant: Dainger
    Person of Interest: Altimer, Wizard
    Additional Person of Interest: One Unidentified Horse
    Case Status: Open, Pending Further Testimony


    THE FORMAL COMPLAINT

    There are few things in this world that irritate me more than adventurers who create their own disasters and then demand that someone else explain them.

    One of those things is arriving at my office to discover an angry, red-bearded adventurer sitting behind my desk.

    Such was the beginning of Case FP-048.

    The complainant, an adventurer by the name of Dainger Frostreaver, appeared before this office demanding an immediate investigation into what he described as a deliberate abandonment by his traveling companions.

    When asked to explain the circumstances, Dainger informed me that he had been serving as the designated tank during an expedition into Fallen Pass.

    For those unfamiliar with adventuring terminology, the tank is the individual expected to stand between the party and whatever unpleasant creature currently wishes to disassemble them.

    It is a demanding occupation with limited opportunities for advancement and an unusually high likelihood of premature death.

    Dainger maintained that during a particularly dangerous encounter, the wizard Altimer attempted to evacuate the party through magical means.

    The evacuation succeeded.

    For everyone except Dainger.

    I requested clarification.

    Dainger repeated himself, considerably louder.

    I informed him that shouting would not improve the quality of his testimony.

    He informed me that neither had Altimer’s spellcasting.

    A fair observation.

    I opened a case file.

    THE EVENTS AT FALLEN PASS

    According to the accounts provided, the party had been engaged in combat with a formidable adversary known as Jokan’Daru.

    The creature was successfully defeated, but the victory came at a considerable cost to the party’s magical reserves.

    Several spellcasters were reportedly running dangerously low on mana, while others had exhausted their reserves entirely.

    Under ordinary circumstances, this would have been an excellent opportunity to rest, recover, and congratulate one another on surviving.

    Unfortunately, Fallen Pass apparently had other plans.

    Before the party could properly recover, a Skri’Var taskmaster entered the engagement.

    The arrival of this additional adversary presented a serious threat to a group whose spellcasters were already struggling to produce enough magical energy to illuminate a candle.

    With their resources depleted and the situation deteriorating, Altimer was told by Dainger to cast an evacuation spell.

    I consider this decision reasonable.

    A controlled withdrawal is generally preferable to allowing one’s companions to be systematically beaten into the ground.

    The difficulty arose during the execution.

    Altimer’s spell reportedly suffered a critical failure.

    Nevertheless, the magic successfully transported the party to safety.

    All of them.

    Except Dainger.

    The tank remained behind in Fallen Pass, where he was subsequently killed.

    I have encountered failed spells before. Most have the decency to fail consistently.

    This one appears to have developed preferences.

    THE QUESTION OF SELECTIVE EVACUATION

    I have spent considerable time examining the circumstances surrounding Altimer’s spellcasting.

    The available accounts establish that the wizard attempted to remove the party from danger and that the spell experienced a critical failure.

    They also establish that nearly everyone benefited from the evacuation.

    The sole exception was Dainger.

    This raises several questions.

    Was the spell’s failure entirely random?

    Did Dainger’s position or circumstances somehow interfere with the magic?

    Was Altimer aware that one member of the party had not been transported?

    And, perhaps most troubling of all, why did the horse survive?

    Yes.

    The horse.

    According to testimony, a horse that had previously been obstructing the group’s activities also escaped the incident.

    I have been informed that this animal was exceptionally fast.

    I have also been informed that it possessed a remarkable talent for standing precisely where adventurers did not want it to stand.

    Yet when the evacuation occurred, the horse survived while the party’s designated defender did not.

    I do not suggest that this constitutes proof of wrongdoing.

    I merely observe that the party appears to have demonstrated a greater capacity for preserving troublesome livestock than its own tank.

    This office considers that discrepancy worthy of examination.

    STATEMENT OF THE COMPLAINANT: DAINGER

    Dainger was asked to provide his account of the incident.

    “We killed Jokan’Daru. We were already running low on mana when that taskmaster showed up. Altimer cast evac, everybody disappeared, and I was left standing there!”

    When asked whether he believed Altimer had deliberately excluded him, Dainger leaned forward.

    “Everybody got out. EVERYBODY. Except me!”

    I asked whether he had any evidence of intentional wrongdoing.

    He pointed to a visual record of the incident.

    “LOOK AT IT!”

    I examined the image.

    Several adventurers were surrounded by magical energy. A Skri’Var taskmaster remained nearby. Beside the campfire lay Dainger’s body.

    I informed the complainant that the image supported his account of the disastrous outcome but did not establish the wizard’s intentions.

    Dainger appeared dissatisfied with this distinction.

    He demanded that Altimer be charged with abandonment.

    I explained that the investigation had not yet established a criminal act.

    He demanded that the horse be charged as an accomplice.

    I informed him that I would consider the matter.

    This appeared to satisfy him temporarily.

    He then demanded to know when he could expect a verdict.

    I informed him that investigations require time.

    He informed me that he had already spent enough time waiting in Fallen Pass.

    I could find no reasonable response to this.

    STATEMENT ATTRIBUTED TO WIZARD ALTIMER

    At the time of this preliminary report, no verified statement from Altimer has been entered into the record.

    However, this office has prepared several questions for the wizard’s consideration.

    First, what circumstances contributed to the critical failure of the evacuation spell?

    Second, was Altimer aware that Dainger had not been transported?

    Third, did the wizard make any attempt to verify that every party member had successfully escaped?

    Fourth, can Altimer explain why the spell appeared to function adequately for the remainder of the group?

    And finally, does Altimer have any professional or personal relationship with the horse?

    I anticipate that the wizard will object to the final question.

    I anticipate asking it anyway.

    Until Altimer provides his account, I shall refrain from determining whether his actions constituted negligence, unfortunate magical circumstances, or an extraordinary display of selective incompetence.

    I am not, however, prepared to rule out any of these possibilities.

    EXAMINATION OF EVIDENCE

    Two visual exhibits have been submitted to this office.

    EXHIBIT A: THE FORMAL DEMAND FOR JUSTICE

    The first image depicts Dainger seated behind MY substantial wooden desk, apparently awaiting the arrival of someone authorized to investigate his complaint.

    The complainant’s expression suggests considerable dissatisfaction.

    I recognize the expression.

    I have worn it myself during most interviews with adventurers.

    Although the image does not establish the circumstances of the Fallen Pass incident, it does demonstrate the complainant’s determination to obtain an official inquiry.

    I have requested that Dainger refrain from occupying my office furniture during future proceedings.

    EXHIBIT B: THE EVACUATION SCENE

    The second image is considerably more relevant to the investigation.

    It depicts the party’s position in Fallen Pass during the evacuation incident.

    Several adventurers appear surrounded by the distinctive visual effects of magical transportation.

    A Skri’Var taskmaster is visible near the party’s position.

    A campfire remains burning nearby.

    And beside that campfire lies Dainger.

    The image corroborates the presence of the taskmaster and the circumstances surrounding the evacuation attempt.

    It also provides visual confirmation of Dainger’s fallen position.

    It does not, by itself, establish the precise mechanics of the spell failure or whether Altimer intended to exclude anyone.

    I consider this an important distinction.

    Dainger considers it an unnecessary technicality.

    The horse has offered no opinion.

    INVESTIGATION OF THE HORSE

    Ordinarily, I do not devote substantial investigative resources to questioning livestock.

    However, this particular animal has attracted sufficient attention that I consider a preliminary inquiry warranted.

    The horse was reportedly present during the events surrounding the evacuation and was among those who survived.

    Witnesses have described it as fast, obstructive, and prone to interfering with the party’s movements.

    I therefore requested that the animal be made available for questioning.

    My initial inquiry produced the following results.

    Investigator: “State your name for the record.”

    Horse: “…”

    Investigator: “Where were you when the evacuation spell was cast?”

    Horse: “…”

    Investigator: “Did Altimer provide you with any preferential treatment?”

    Horse: “…”

    At this point, the animal turned away and began eating.

    I have encountered this behavior from suspects before.

    Usually they are rogues.

    The horse’s refusal to cooperate has been entered into the record.

    No charges have been recommended at this time.

    INVESTIGATOR’S FINDINGS

    After reviewing the available accounts and photographic evidence, I have established the following:

    1. The party successfully defeated Jokan’Daru during an expedition into Fallen Pass.
    2. The encounter left several spellcasters with dangerously low or exhausted mana reserves.
    3. A Skri’Var taskmaster subsequently entered the engagement.
    4. The wizard Altimer attempted to evacuate the party from danger.
    5. The evacuation spell reportedly suffered a critical failure.
    6. Despite this failure, the spell transported every party member except Dainger to safety.
    7. Dainger remained behind and was killed.
    8. A horse associated with the party also survived the incident.
    9. Dainger has formally demanded an investigation.
    10. The horse has declined to provide a useful statement.

    The evidence establishes an unfortunate and potentially avoidable loss.

    It does not establish that Altimer deliberately abandoned Dainger.

    Nor does it establish that the horse participated in any conspiracy, despite the complainant’s insistence that the animal’s survival is inherently suspicious.

    I must also acknowledge that the party was operating under dangerous conditions, with depleted magical resources and an additional hostile creature entering the fight.

    Such circumstances may contribute to errors in judgment and spellcasting.

    They do not, however, explain why the evacuation worked for everyone except the tank.

    That question remains unanswered.

    OFFICIAL DETERMINATION

    At present, I find insufficient evidence to support charges of attempted murder, deliberate abandonment, or conspiracy between the wizard Altimer and the horse.

    I do, however, find substantial grounds for further examination of the following possible offenses:

    Gross Magical Negligence: For conducting an evacuation that resulted in the abandonment of a party member.

    Selective Transportation of Personnel: For the apparent failure to include the designated tank in an otherwise successful evacuation.

    Failure to Account for Essential Party Members: For an evacuation outcome in which the individual responsible for absorbing enemy attacks was the only person left behind.

    Suspicious Preservation of Livestock: Pending clarification of the horse’s precise involvement.

    The first three allegations remain subject to Altimer’s testimony and further examination of the spell failure.

    The fourth is currently being maintained primarily because Dainger refuses to let the matter go.

    No formal charges have been filed.

    The investigation remains open.

    INVESTIGATOR’S FINAL NOTE

    Over the course of my career, I have examined many unfortunate incidents involving adventurers.

    I have investigated warriors who charged into battle without weapons, rogues who accidentally stole from their own companions, and spellcasters whose magical experiments resulted in the destruction of perfectly respectable buildings.

    Yet I cannot recall another incident in which an evacuation spell managed to rescue an entire party while leaving behind the one individual specifically employed to prevent everyone else from dying.

    Wizard Altimer may be entirely innocent.

    The critical failure may have been unavoidable.

    The horse may simply have been fortunate.

    But until I receive a satisfactory explanation, I shall continue to regard this matter with considerable suspicion.

    In conclusion, I find no conclusive evidence of attempted murder.

    I do, however, find overwhelming evidence that the horse has a better evacuation plan than the tank.

    The facts have been recorded. The excuses have been noted. The truth, regrettably, remains under investigation.

    Filed and submitted,
    Thaddeus Grimledger
    Chief Investigator
    Office of Investigations & Questionable Affairs
    The Wayfarer’s Gazette

    Case FP-048: Open, Pending Testimony from Altimer

    The Office of Investigations & Questionable Affairs reminds all adventurers that successful evacuation procedures should ideally include everyone. Particularly the individual standing between the party and certain death.

  • WANTED: Geaeren, Suspected Weapon Thief and Practitioner of Ninja Looting

    WANTED: Geaeren, Suspected Weapon Thief and Practitioner of Ninja Looting

    OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS & QUESTIONABLE AFFAIRS

    CASE GL-049: THE MATTER OF THE MISSING WEAPON

    Server: Nunevoth (3-box server)

    OFFICIAL NOTICE OF PERSON SOUGHT FOR QUESTIONING

    By order of Chief Investigator Thaddeus Grimledger, the Office of Investigations & Questionable Affairs hereby announces an inquiry into the suspicious disappearance of a weapon entrusted to an adventurer identified as Geaeren.

    According to a complaint received by this office, a generous adventurer temporarily loaned his weapon to Geaeren, who was serving as the group’s main tank and reportedly possessed equipment of questionable effectiveness.

    The weapon was intended to improve the party’s chances of survival.

    Its subsequent failure to return to its rightful owner has raised several concerns.

    Chief among them is the apparent confusion between the words borrow and keep.

    Geaeren is therefore sought for questioning regarding allegations of:

    • Failure to Return Borrowed Property
    • Suspected Ninja Looting
    • Unauthorized Acquisition of Another Adventurer’s Generosity
    • Suspicious Mustache Activity
    • Hoarding of Shiny Objects
    • Conduct Unbecoming of a Borrower
    • General Nuisance to Decent Adventurers

    The accompanying likeness has been prepared in the traditional manner by an artist whose qualifications remain under investigation.

    Anyone possessing information relevant to this matter is encouraged to contact The Wayfarer’s Gazette.

    Geaeren is invited to provide his account of the incident and arrange the return of the disputed property.

    INVESTIGATOR’S NOTE:

    “I have examined the complaint and find the circumstances troubling.

    A borrowed weapon is not a gift. A generous adventurer is not a traveling equipment merchant. And a suspiciously well-equipped tank is not necessarily an innocent one.

    Until the matter is resolved, I recommend that all adventurers exercise caution when lending valuable possessions.

    Particularly to individuals who appear to have misplaced both their shirts and their understanding of personal property.”

    Case Status: Open, Pending Testimony and Recovery of Property

    Filed by Thaddeus Grimledger
    Chief Investigator
    Office of Investigations & Questionable Affairs

    The facts have been recorded. The excuses have been noted. The truth, regrettably, remains under investigation.

    Editor’s note: This notice is a satirical Gazette dramatization of a player-submitted allegation. No finding of theft or misconduct has been established.

    RELATED CASE FILE: THE BORROWED WEAPON AFFAIR

    This investigation originated from correspondence received by Auntie Agro concerning a weapon generously loaned to a fellow adventurer and allegedly never returned.

    While Auntie Agro has offered her customary assessment of the complainant’s questionable judgment, the Office of Investigations & Questionable Affairs considers the matter worthy of further scrutiny.

    Readers wishing to examine the original complaint and Auntie Agro’s response may consult her November advice column.

    Read Auntie Agro’s Advice →

  • WANTED: TKO, Alleged Kill Stealer and Practitioner of Extraordinary Asshattery

    WANTED: TKO, Alleged Kill Stealer and Practitioner of Extraordinary Asshattery

    WANTED: TKO and the Curious Case of the Dog-Walking Camp Claim

    THE WAYFARER’S GAZETTE
    Office of Investigations & Questionable Affairs

    Case GL-050
    Chief Investigator: Thaddeus Grimledger
    Server: Nunevoth (3-Box)
    Principal Subject: TKO, Deep Elf Monk
    Associated Characters: Ares and Pro
    Status: Under Investigation
    Allegations: Disputed Camp Claim, Suspected Play Nice Policy Violations, Alleged Camp Stealing, and Extraordinary Asshattery

    THE INCIDENT

    The Office of Investigations & Questionable Affairs has received a complaint concerning a most peculiar confrontation at the Overlord General’s camp.

    According to the complainant, an adventuring party fought its way through hostile territory, cleared the Overlord General’s room and its surrounding areas, and established a functioning camp.

    The party reportedly maintained control of the area for at least thirty-five minutes, with the total time approaching an hour.

    All appeared to be proceeding in the customary fashion. Enemies were dispatched, the camp was maintained, and the adventurers presumably enjoyed the rare satisfaction of having accomplished something without immediately dying.

    Then three individuals appeared.

    TKO, a Deep Elf Monk, accompanied by characters identified as Ares and Pro, reportedly logged into the very room in which the Overlord General spawns.

    Upon arriving, TKO allegedly informed the occupying party that the camp already belonged to him.

    He further claimed to have held the location for several hours before logging out.

    His explanation for this absence?

    He had taken his dog for a walk.

    Chief Investigator Grimledger immediately requested additional parchment.

    THE CANINE DEFENSE

    The Office has encountered many explanations for questionable adventuring conduct.

    Some have been plausible.

    Others have involved lag, unfortunate accidents, misunderstood instructions, or an alleged inability to distinguish one’s own belongings from those of another.

    However, the assertion that a camp remains reserved while its claimant departs to exercise a household animal presents an entirely new administrative challenge.

    Grimledger reviewed the Play Nice Policy update issued by GM Trent on October 22, 2026, with particular attention to the provisions governing camp priority.

    The published policy addresses circumstances in which players lose priority over a camp, including leaving the immediate area except while continuing to interact with the camp.

    The Office found no general exemption for recreational canine activities.

    Grimledger issued the following observation:

    “I have examined the relevant regulations and discovered no provision concerning dogs, leashes, walking routes, or the preservation of camping rights through the exercise of domestic animals.

    I checked twice.

    The dog is not mentioned.

    Until further evidence is presented, I must regard the Canine Defense as an argument of considerable creativity and questionable regulatory merit.”

    For the record, the dog has not been accused of misconduct.

    Its whereabouts are not considered relevant to the investigation, although Grimledger insists that its walking schedule be entered into the case file.

    THE DISPUTED ENGAGEMENTS

    The complainant further alleges that, after asserting his claim, TKO and his two associated characters participated in taking the Overlord General on at least two subsequent occasions while the original party remained at the camp.

    The complainant reports that petitions were submitted to the game’s GM team and that the party was awaiting a response during the disputed encounters.

    Whether those engagements constituted camp stealing, kill stealing, or another violation of the published Play Nice Policy is a matter for the game’s authorized staff to determine.

    The Gazette has not received a confirmed GM ruling on this incident.

    Grimledger nevertheless considers the reported sequence sufficiently unusual to warrant inclusion in his files.

    “One party clears the camp. Another appears and announces prior ownership based upon an earlier occupation interrupted by a dog walk.

    Thereafter, the parties disagree about the ownership of the General, who, regrettably, has not submitted a statement.

    This office shall continue its inquiries.”

    THREE SUSPECTS, ONE ADVENTURER

    A further complication emerged when investigators learned that TKO, Ares, and Pro were reportedly controlled by the same player on the Nunevoth three-box server.

    This revelation caused considerable consternation within the Office.

    Grimledger had already prepared three separate interrogation schedules.

    “The fact that three characters are controlled by one individual does not reduce the quantity of paperwork,” the Chief Investigator declared.

    “If anything, it increases it. I now require three character statements, one player statement, and an explanation as to why my clerks have been instructed to address three suspects who may all answer at once.”

    Ares and Pro remain listed as associated characters in the complaint. Their individual appearances have not been established for the purposes of the Gazette’s wanted illustration.

    THE INVESTIGATOR’S FINDINGS

    After reviewing the complainant’s account, the Office records the following preliminary observations:

    1. The reporting party states that it cleared and maintained the Overlord General’s camp before TKO and the associated characters appeared.
    2. TKO reportedly asserted a prior claim despite having logged out to walk his dog.
    3. The complainant alleges that TKO, Ares, and Pro participated in at least two subsequent disputed kills of the Overlord General.
    4. The complainant reports having submitted petitions to the game’s GM team.
    5. No official ruling or disciplinary finding has been established in the evidence presently available to the Gazette.

    These findings record the allegations and reported sequence of events. They do not constitute a determination of guilt.

    NOTICE TO WITNESSES AND THE ACCUSED

    The Office of Investigations & Questionable Affairs invites anyone with firsthand knowledge of the incident, including TKO and the player controlling Ares and Pro, to provide an account for the record.

    Contradictory testimony is welcome.

    Supporting evidence is encouraged.

    Unsubstantiated excuses will be carefully filed, indexed, and subjected to Grimledger’s customary expression of profound disappointment.

    Those wishing to examine the applicable rules may consult GM Trent’s Play Nice Policy Update, October 22, 2026.

    The Gazette’s investigation is an independent, satirical community report. It is not an official game investigation, and its wanted notices do not authorize harassment, retaliation, or enforcement action against any player.

    FINAL REMARKS FROM CHIEF INVESTIGATOR GRIMLEDGER

    “I have investigated missing weapons, questionable evacuations, and adventurers who possess a remarkable talent for placing their companions in mortal danger.

    Yet I confess this matter has introduced a question for which my training has not prepared me.

    At precisely what distance from one’s keyboard does a dog walk become an abandonment of one’s camp?

    The regulations appear considerably clearer than the defendant’s explanation.

    Nevertheless, the official determination rests with those authorized to make it.

    I shall await further testimony.

    And should anyone locate the dog, kindly refrain from arresting it. The animal appears to be the only participant whose conduct has not been questioned.”

    The facts have been recorded. The excuses have been noted. The truth, regrettably, remains under investigation.

    Filed by Thaddeus Grimledger
    Chief Investigator, Office of Investigations & Questionable Affairs
    The Wayfarer’s Gazette

  • WANTED: Jerbear, Alleged Camp Disruptor and Practitioner of Extraordinary Asshattery

    WANTED: Jerbear, Alleged Camp Disruptor and Practitioner of Extraordinary Asshattery

    WANTED: Jerbear and the Curious Case of the Forty-Mob Defense

    THE WAYFARER’S GAZETTE
    Office of Investigations & Questionable Affairs

    Case GL-051: The Trem Camp Dispute

    Chief Investigator: Thaddeus Grimledger
    Server: Trem
    Subject: Jerbear, Dwarf Bard
    Complainant: Tambzie, Goblin Shadowknight (Twitch: TambsTV)
    Reported Offenses: Camp Disruption, Attempted Camp Stealing, Back Talking, General Tomfoolery and Asshattery
    Case Status: Under Investigation

    AN UNWELCOME PERFORMANCE

    The Office of Investigations & Questionable Affairs has received yet another complaint concerning an adventurer who apparently believed that arriving at an occupied camp constituted sufficient grounds to claim it.

    The incident, reported by Tambzie, a Goblin Shadowknight adventuring upon the Trem server, concerns a Dwarf Bard known as Jerbear.

    According to the complaint, Jerbear entered an area being camped by Tambzie and attempted to interfere with the established arrangement.

    What followed has been described as camp disruption, attempted camp stealing, back talking, and behavior of such questionable judgment that the Office has reluctantly opened a separate file for general asshattery.

    Chief Investigator Grimledger was informed that the individual in question was a Bard.

    He immediately requested a headache remedy.

    The Forty-Mob Defense

    When confronted about pulling mobs from an area the group had been using for approximately five hours, Jerbear reportedly offered an explanation.

    There were, he suggested, plenty of mobs available.

    Approximately forty, by his estimation.

    He further remarked that it would hardly be a catastrophe if the group’s puller had to travel a little farther to find additional enemies.

    The exchange reportedly included the memorable address, “Pal!”

    Chief Investigator Grimledger examined this argument with considerable attention.

    “Forty mobs,” he repeated, carefully writing the number in his ledger.

    “An impressive quantity. I presume the accused conducted a proper census before arriving at this figure.”

    The Chief Investigator then requested a map showing the locations of all forty alleged mobs, their respective availability, and the distance Tambzie’s puller would be required to travel to accommodate Jerbear’s activities.

    No such map was provided.

    “I find it remarkable,” Grimledger continued, “that an adventurer can identify forty available enemies yet still consider it necessary to select those already being pulled by another group.

    One might reasonably suggest that the accused follow his own advice and venture farther afield.”

    The Office has provisionally classified this explanation as The Forty-Mob Defense.

    It is not presently regarded as a recognized legal doctrine.

    A QUESTION OF MUSICAL ETIQUETTE

    The Office wishes to clarify that being a Bard is not, in itself, suspicious.

    Although the Chief Investigator has long maintained that anyone who insists upon providing musical accompaniment during dangerous expeditions deserves careful observation, no regulation currently prohibits the practice.

    Nevertheless, the allegations against Jerbear present an interesting problem.

    A Bard is ordinarily expected to contribute to the success of an adventuring party.

    Attempting to interfere with another party’s camp, if substantiated, would appear to be a rather less welcome contribution.

    “I have reviewed the complaint,” Grimledger stated.

    “The accused is described as a musician. Yet the only performance brought to my attention appears to have been an argument.

    If this is considered entertainment, I fear the standards of the performing arts have deteriorated considerably.”

    THE MATTER OF BACK TALKING

    Of particular concern to the Chief Investigator is the accusation of back talking.

    Grimledger has spent decades developing a professional manner intended to discourage unnecessary conversation.

    He considers the continued existence of unnecessary conversation a personal insult.

    “There are occasions when an adventurer must speak,” he explained.

    “To warn companions of danger. To request assistance. To provide useful information.

    And then there are occasions when an adventurer speaks merely because silence would deprive the world of his opinions.

    I suspect this case may involve the latter.”

    The Office acknowledges that disagreeing with another player is not, by itself, a violation of the game’s rules.

    Back talking has therefore been entered into the Gazette’s records as a charge of questionable manners rather than an established disciplinary offense.

    Grimledger has nonetheless ordered it underlined twice.

    THE FINAL ACT: AN ADMINISTRATIVE SILENCING

    The confrontation reportedly reached its conclusion when Tambzie placed Jerbear on his ignore list.

    No further argument was required.

    The Bard’s remarks simply ceased to reach their intended audience.

    Upon learning of this development, Grimledger expressed something approaching professional admiration.

    “Extraordinary,” he observed.

    “An entire dispute concluded through the administrative removal of one individual’s ability to be heard.

    I have spent years attempting to achieve similar results during departmental meetings.”

    He has since requested information concerning whether the ignore function can be applied to unsolicited reports, excessive explanations, and Nynkies Nimblefingers when the Editor-in-Chief begins discussing newspaper circulation figures.

    The request remains pending.

    THE DRUMMING QUESTION

    The wanted illustration depicts Jerbear carrying a drum, an instrument that has prompted considerable discussion within the Office.

    Grimledger wishes to establish whether the drum was used during the reported incident.

    No such evidence has yet been submitted.

    Nevertheless, the Chief Investigator has prepared a provisional statement.

    “Should the accused have attempted to announce ownership of the camp by beating a drum, I would consider the method both unnecessarily theatrical and wholly insufficient as documentation.

    A properly established claim does not become more legitimate merely because it is accompanied by percussion.”

    The Office emphasizes that the drum is an artistic detail of the wanted illustration, not independently verified evidence from the encounter.

    PRELIMINARY FINDINGS

    Having reviewed the eyewitness account, the Office records the following:

    1. Tambzie, a Goblin Shadowknight on the Trem server, was reportedly occupying a camp when the dispute occurred.
    2. Jerbear, identified as a Dwarf Bard, allegedly attempted to interfere with or claim the camp.
    3. The encounter reportedly involved an argument and conduct described by the complainant as back talking.
    4. The complaint includes allegations of camp disruption and attempted camp stealing.
    5. No official Game Master ruling or disciplinary finding has been provided to the Gazette.

    These observations record the complaint and do not constitute proof that Jerbear violated the Play Nice Policy.

    NOTICE TO JERBEAR

    The Office of Investigations & Questionable Affairs invites Jerbear to submit his account of the incident.

    He may explain the circumstances of the camp dispute, address the allegations, and clarify whether any musical instruments were involved.

    A written statement is preferred.

    Musical submissions will be considered only if accompanied by a transcription, three copies of the lyrics, and a signed declaration that no further camp disputes will be settled through percussion.

    The Office also welcomes additional firsthand accounts or relevant evidence.

    FINAL REMARKS FROM CHIEF INVESTIGATOR GRIMLEDGER

    “I have now examined complaints involving missing weapons, questionable evacuations, disputed camps, and adventurers whose explanations require more patience than their actions deserve.

    Today I am presented with a Dwarf Bard accused of attempting to appropriate another adventurer’s camp.

    I am further informed that he engaged in back talking.

    The evidence remains incomplete, and I shall not pronounce judgment where the facts have not been established.

    However, I offer one piece of professional advice to all wandering musicians.

    If you discover that someone else has already occupied the stage, do not assume that playing louder makes it yours.

    And kindly stop beating that blasted drum.”

    The facts have been recorded. The excuses have been noted. The truth, regrettably, remains under investigation.

    Filed by Thaddeus Grimledger
    Chief Investigator, Office of Investigations & Questionable Affairs

    The Wayfarer’s Gazette
    Volume I, Issue No. 2 | November 2026

    Editorial Notice: This is an independent, satirical community report based on a reported gameplay encounter. Allegations remain unproven. The Gazette is not affiliated with the game’s development or moderation teams, and this notice is not an authorization to harass or retaliate against any player.